What are the differences between Foonf and Fllo? Jean-Sébastien July 08, 2020 14:49 Updated Follow Foonf features Rigid LATCH (UAS) connectors for forward-facing installations Fllo uses the same flexible LATCH (UAS) belt for both rear and forward-facing installations Foonf's REACT energy management system is designed to work best with a Rigid LATCH (UAS) installation Fllo's EACT energy management system is designed to work best with a belt installation (vehicle belt or LATCH belt) Foonf has three different recline positions which the seat can be adjusted into Forward-facing: Positions 1 or 2 Rear-facing: Positions 2 or 3 Fllo's angle may be adjusted by repositioning it on your vehicle seat Foonf uses an angled Rear-Facing Base which attaches to the bottom of the seat to help provide an appropriate rear-facing angle Fllo features a built-in Recline Foot which swivels out into position to help provide an appropriate rear-facing angle Fllo is approx. 10 lb lighter and sits a bit lower on your vehicle seat You can view more here: https://clekinc.com/what-are-the-differences-between-foonf-and-fllo/ Related articles What are the differences between Oobr, Olli, and Ozzi? What do I do if my car seat obstructs my rear visibility? What crash testing does Fllo undergo? Does the merino wool fabric feature any protections against stains or moisture? What are the differences between Liing and Liingo? Comments 0 comments Article is closed for comments.